• Users Online: 105
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 161-176

Analysis of contested narratives in Cui Yingjie case

School of Foreign Languages, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China

Correspondence Address:
Luping Zhang
China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_74_16

Rights and Permissions

This paper endeavors to explore how to analyze the lateral difference between factual narrative texts to the same case, as well as the narrative mechanism that caused such lateral difference. It applies its four perspectives of the story model, namely, (1) coverage, (2) coherence, (3) uniqueness, and (4) goodness of fit to the study of evidence in Cui Yingjie case. The author explores why different interpretations the prosecution and defense adopted in the trial of the case could not provide a reliable logic to illustrate the necessity of their statements. In light of the story model, this paper explains the mechanism behind the techniques of evidence presentation both prosecution and defense adopted in the trial of Cui Yingjie case.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded222    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal