Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine

: 2021  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 96--104

Deceptive forensics and the “generalized” negation of the evidences

Qi YaPing 
 China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China

Correspondence Address:
Qi YaPing
China University of political science and law, student apartment 1, No. 25, Xitucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing

Deceptive interrogation, undercover investigation, special information, and covert spying may be used as deceptive evidentiary acts. By Article 52 of the Criminal Procedure Law, these methods must undergo the examination of the admissibility of evidence in the trial stage. How interpretate obtaining evidence by deception such judicial postmortem review should include the necessity of investigation and the legality of investigation. The sources of information examined should not only be limited to the defendant's confession and prosecution files but also include the evidence of personal testimony, intelligence sources, and material evidence sources, especially the appropriate presentation of investigation files. In a case, the necessity, possibility, and possibility of distortion of the means of obtaining evidence determine whether the specific evidence has the legality of evidence. Documents must be able to truthfully reflect the implementation process of specific evidence in the case.

How to cite this article:
YaPing Q. Deceptive forensics and the “generalized” negation of the evidences.J Forensic Sci Med 2021;7:96-104

How to cite this URL:
YaPing Q. Deceptive forensics and the “generalized” negation of the evidences. J Forensic Sci Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 27 ];7:96-104
Available from:;year=2021;volume=7;issue=3;spage=96;epage=104;aulast=YaPing;type=0